What legal pathways exist for a foreign national to become a permanent U.S. resident?
Full conversation
I need info about a Canadian staying in the USA longer than they told customs they'd be here.
I understand that navigating immigration issues can be stressful. Can you please share how long the individual has overstayed their initial timeframe given to customs?
They haven't overstayed yet, but as of tomorrow, they will. We don't know how long they need to stay here, but at this time, we expect it to be less than 30 days in total (they said they'd be here about 8 days when they entered through customs).
Is this person currently facing any legal actions or complications due to their extended stay?
No legal actions or consequences.
Is there anything else the Lawyer should know before I connect you? Rest assured they'll be able to help with your immigration concerns.
I don't know.
Hi there, and welcome! I'm Guillermo Senmartin, a licensed U.S. immigration attorney with over 27 years of experience in this area. I'm really glad you're here, and I'm looking forward to helping you. Is there anything specific about the Canadian's stay that you are concerned about, given that they will overstay as of tomorrow?
We just want to ensure we're abiding by the letter and spirit of the law and want to cover all our bases so that there are no future problems with entry. Since you are so experienced, possibly you can offer advice about potential avenues for a Canadian to move to the USA, as well? A marriage visa is not available, so we may need to be creative.
Have they filed an I-539/I-539A to extend their status?
Not yet. Is it necessary?
Well, if they were to fall out of status (tomorrow), any options to getting back into status through employment, investment, or study without leaving the U.S. would be closed to them. Also, once they overstay even one day, they are not allowed to use only their Canadian passports anymore. They would be required to apply for a visa.
We just noticed that their I-94 form says "Admit Until Date" of October 6th, 2026. So does that mean they're okay even though they originally told the officer they'd be here only 8 days?
When did they last enter the U.S.?
April 7th, 2026.
If a Canadian enters the U.S. using their Canadian passport only, they get 180 days (6 months) normally. Why would you believe that if they entered the U.S. April 7th, 2026 that they would overstay tomorrow?
Only because I was worried that when the CBP officer that gave them entry said they'd be here for 8 days and now are changing that. You might say I'm just being overly cautious and trying hard to ensure they stay within the law, especially with the current crackdown on immigration.
OK. Then I would not worry about that. As long as the CBP Officer didn't specify that they only had X amount of days, you go by the I-94 which says October 6, 2026. So, as far as that goes, they are OK.
Fantastic, thank you so much for your advice! Do you have any opinion about the second question, or should I ask that in a separate chat?
That is much harder, unfortunately. There are generally five avenues to obtain U.S. Lawful Permanent Residency: through family, through employment, through the asylum or refugee process, through investment, or through the Diversity Lottery.
For family, it must be immediate family, such as a U.S. Citizen spouse or U.S. Citizen children over 21 to come immediately, and sometimes a Lawful Permanent Resident spouse or U.S. Lawful Permanent Resident parent of an unmarried child under 21, or a U.S. Citizen or Lawful Permanent Resident parent, or a U.S. Citizen sibling, but the wait for that is about 4 to 14 years or more. These family categories are set out in (8 U.S.C. § 1153(a))
Through employment, they would generally have to prove that they would not be taking away a job from a U.S. worker, and the less experience and education they have, the harder that is to do. The employment-based preference categories are found in (8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)).
Through the asylum or refugee process, they must prove that they will be persecuted, tortured, or killed if they stay in their country, and that this will happen to them because of their nationality, race, religion, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group, not because they would run the same risk as anyone else in their country of falling victim to a crime or bad economic conditions. The asylum framework is set out in (8 U.S.C. § 1158).
Through investment, they are looking at generally $1,050,000.00 for a residency, or $800,000.00 in an area designated as rural or a high-employment area, and in both cases, the investment has to create ten or more jobs for U.S. workers. This is the EB-5 immigrant investor category under (8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(5)).
And through the lottery, it would be tough to win one of the 50,000 visas available per year, and some countries do not qualify. The Diversity Visa program is authorized under (8 U.S.C. § 1153(c)).
Then there are some visas available to stay temporarily and then later change to Lawful Permanent Residency if they qualify. Some of the visas available through employment (if they have a job offer and qualify) are H-1B for professional workers, H-2A for seasonal agricultural workers, H-2B for seasonal nonagricultural workers, and H-3 for industrial trainees. Then there are the F-1 and M-1 for students and J-1 for exchange visitors. And then there is the E-1 for treaty traders and E-2 for treaty investors (these types of visas are not available in all countries).
As Canadian citizens, they have the option of a TN visa as well. But the job offered has to be on the TN professions list, which is found here: (8 CFR § 214.6)
Is there anything else I can help clarify for you?
Thanks for the info! I think the part that interests us most is the idea of them bringing a job with them. Would it be true that if they worked remotely in Canada and brought that job with them, and the job paid a more or less sustainable living, that would be a good avenue of entry?
While visiting the U.S., they are not allowed to work while in the U.S., not even remotely.
If they (Canadian citizen) owned or were a partner in a business with me (U.S. citizen), such as a business that produces content and earns advertising revenue, is that an avenue into the United States long term?
They would have to make a substantial investment of perhaps around $150,000 or so, and probably own 50% or more, in order to get an E-1 or E-2 treaty visa. Do you have any other U.S. immigration law questions for me?
Not now, thanks for the info.
You're very welcome, and I'm glad I could help!
Disclaimer
By messaging FreeLegalAdvice.com, you agree to our Terms and have read our Privacy Policy.
The information provided on AskaLawyer.com is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the information presented, we make no guarantees regarding its completeness or applicability to your specific circumstances.
Use of this website does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and FreeLegalAdvice.com or any of its attorneys. Communications through this website, including any responses from attorneys, are not privileged or confidential. For advice tailored to your individual situation, we recommend consulting a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.
FreeLegalAdvice.com disclaims any liability for actions taken or not taken based on the content of this site. We are not responsible for any third-party content that may be accessed through this website. Reliance on any information provided herein is solely at your own risk.