[LA] Can a nonparty who was unsuccessfully subpoenaed move to traverse someone’s pauper status?

Louisiana Legal
16
5
Ray
Ray

66,079 satisfied customers

View context
Solved

Based on your situation, there are several legal arguments and considerations in Louisiana that could potentially support your case. In Louisiana, pauper status allows a party to proceed without paying court costs due to financial hardship. However, this status can be challenged or "traversed" if there is a belief that the party does not actually qualify. The court will typically review the financial situation of the party to determine if the pauper status is justified. Under La. Dist. Ct. Rule 8.1, the court, on its own motion or the motion of any party, may hold a hearing to traverse a litigant's right to proceed in forma pauperis; the underlying pauper-status framework itself is set out in La. Code Civ. Proc. arts. 5181–5188.

Regarding the protective order, if a judgment includes terms that were not discussed or agreed upon during the hearing, such as a protective order that was not granted, it may be contested. The accuracy of the judgment in reflecting the court's oral ruling is crucial, and discrepancies can be grounds for filing a motion for reconsideration or a new trial.

The process of filing objections and motions, as well as adherence to procedural rules and Rule 9.5, which governs circulation of a proposed judgment and the certificate accompanying it, is important in ensuring that your rights are protected and that the court's decisions are based on a complete and accurate record.

Full conversation

In Louisiana can a movant (not a party to the case, but a party that was subpoenaed unsuccessfully) bring a motion to traverse a party's pauper status?

user
Lexi
Lexi, Chatbot

I understand that navigating legal procedures can be complex. Can you please provide more details about the case or situation related to the pauper status?

This stems from a subpoena of a third party. The other party filed a motion to quash, a protective order, and a motion for sanctions because Rule 6:333 was not followed. The judge quashed the subpoena at the hearing, and nothing came up at the hearing about a protective order, but the judge did grant sanctions. The judge said if I wanted those records, I would need to follow Rule 6:333. The judge also asked the other party to write a judgment on her oral ruling and follow Rule 9.5. The other party inserted a protective order into the judgment that the judge did not grant (the word is not even in the transcript), and I let the other party know. The other party still filed the incorrect judgment with the protective order, and in their Rule 9.5 certificate said I objected "to language as such" without stating the nature of my objection. They then submitted a partial transcript with their proposed judgment that ended two pages before the hearing actually ended. I submitted my objection in the correct time frame along with proposed orders and a complete transcript. The judge signed the order with the protective order two months later. I immediately filed a motion for reconsideration, or alternatively a motion for new trial. There was a hearing conference, and the hearing officer's recommendation was to dismiss my claim. I filed an objection to that, and now it is scheduled for a hearing in front of the judge on the same issue, which is my right. The other side has filed a motion for sanctions against me, saying they put me on notice at the hearing that a written judgment controls over the transcript and citing case law, and they have also filed to traverse my pauper status. All of this is before the judge in about two weeks.

user
Lexi
Lexi, Chatbot

Have you already filed any motions or documents in this matter, or are you seeking guidance on how to proceed?

I have filed motions and need to file more, and I am seeking guidance.

user
Lexi
Lexi, Chatbot

Is there anything else the lawyer should know before I connect you? Rest assured they'll be able to help with your pauper status.

No.

user
Ray
Ray

Hi and welcome to our service. Ray here to help you today. Please bear with me a few moments while I review your question and respond.

Ray
Ray

Based on your situation, there are several legal arguments and considerations in Louisiana that could potentially support your case. In Louisiana, pauper status allows a party to proceed without paying court costs due to financial hardship. However, this status can be challenged or "traversed" if there is a belief that the party does not actually qualify. The court will typically review the financial situation of the party to determine if the pauper status is justified. Under La. Dist. Ct. Rule 8.1, the court, on its own motion or the motion of any party, may hold a hearing to traverse a litigant's right to proceed in forma pauperis; the underlying pauper-status framework itself is set out in La. Code Civ. Proc. arts. 5181–5188.

Regarding the protective order, if a judgment includes terms that were not discussed or agreed upon during the hearing, such as a protective order that was not granted, it may be contested. The accuracy of the judgment in reflecting the court's oral ruling is crucial, and discrepancies can be grounds for filing a motion for reconsideration or a new trial.

The process of filing objections and motions, as well as adherence to procedural rules and Rule 9.5, which governs circulation of a proposed judgment and the certificate accompanying it, is important in ensuring that your rights are protected and that the court's decisions are based on a complete and accurate record.

I filed an exception based on the fact that this person who is attempting to traverse my pauper status is not a party to the case.

user
Ray
Ray

Based on your situation, there are several legal arguments and considerations in Louisiana that could potentially support your case. In Louisiana, pauper status allows a party to proceed without paying court costs due to financial hardship. However, this status can be challenged or "traversed" if there is a belief that the party does not actually qualify. The court will typically review the financial situation of the party to determine if the pauper status is justified. Regarding the protective order, if a judgment includes terms that were not discussed or agreed upon during the hearing, such as a protective order that was not granted, it may be contested. The accuracy of the judgment in reflecting the court's oral ruling is crucial, and discrepancies can be grounds for filing a motion for reconsideration or a new trial. The process of filing objections and motions, as well as adherence to procedural rules like Rule 6:333 and Rule 9.5, is important in ensuring that your rights are protected and that the court's decisions are based on a complete and accurate record.

Ok, the attorney's Rule 9.5 certificate did not state my objection; it only said I objected to "language of the same."

user
Ray
Ray

It sounds like you're dealing with a complex legal situation. Let's break down the steps you can take:

  1. Challenge the protective order — Since the protective order was not granted by the judge, you have grounds to contest its inclusion in the judgment. You've already filed a motion for reconsideration, which is a good step. Ensure you have all relevant transcripts and documents to support your case.
  2. Address the Rule 9.5 certificate issue — The attorney's Rule 9.5 certificate should accurately reflect your objections. Since it only mentioned "language of the same," you might want to file a motion to clarify or correct the record. This can help ensure that your objections are properly documented.
  3. Prepare for the hearing — Since you have a hearing scheduled, prepare by organizing all your documents, including your objections, proposed orders, and complete transcripts. Be ready to clearly articulate your objections and the discrepancies in the judgment.
  4. Consider legal representation — If possible, consult with a local attorney who specializes in Louisiana civil procedure. They can provide specific advice tailored to your case and represent you in court if needed.
  5. Respond to the motion for sanctions — The other party's motion for sanctions against you should be addressed by demonstrating that you followed procedural rules and that the judgment does not accurately reflect the court's oral ruling. Gather all evidence, including transcripts and any correspondence, to support your position.

Ok, I am just nervous when they throw around the word sanctions.

user

Thank you.

user
Ray
Ray

I hope I was able to help resolve your issue! If you have any other questions, feel free to ask. Just a friendly reminder, don't hesitate to reach out whenever you need assistance!

Disclaimer


By messaging FreeLegalAdvice.com, you agree to our Terms and have read our Privacy Policy.

The information provided on AskaLawyer.com is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the information presented, we make no guarantees regarding its completeness or applicability to your specific circumstances.

Use of this website does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and FreeLegalAdvice.com or any of its attorneys. Communications through this website, including any responses from attorneys, are not privileged or confidential. For advice tailored to your individual situation, we recommend consulting a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction.

FreeLegalAdvice.com disclaims any liability for actions taken or not taken based on the content of this site. We are not responsible for any third-party content that may be accessed through this website. Reliance on any information provided herein is solely at your own risk.

Free Legal Advice Logo
Free Legal Advice Logo
Intake Questions
Question  of 3
Loading...

Lexi, Chatbot

Would you like to chat with a licensed attorney?

Online

Yes
No

Would you like to continue with unlimited answers from legal-specific AI?

Legal AI

Using ChatGPT 4o

Yes
No
Loading...

How do you like to pay?

By proceeding with payment, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy. You authorize us to charge $ today and $ thereafter until canceled. You may cancel anytime in the My Account section to stop future charges.

Total Due:

Processing...

After purchasing, your chat will begin with an attorney.

By proceeding with payment, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy. You authorize us to charge $ today and $ thereafter until canceled. You may cancel anytime in the My Account section to stop future charges.

Total Due:

After purchasing, your chat will begin with an attorney.

It looks like you already have an account with Free Legal Advice.

We have sent you a magic link to . Click the link in your email to sign in and continue your chat.

spin

Step of 6 •

You'll receive an email at as soon as the lawyer joins the conversation 🙏🏻😊

Over 90% of lawyers connect within 5 minutes. If you're not online at that moment, don't worry — the lawyer will reply to your message while you're away.

You're also welcome to stay in the chat while waiting to be connected 💬✨

Waiting for lawyer

You've reached your AI chat limit

Talk to a real lawyer to get expert legal advice tailored to your situation.

Your lawyer will reply as soon as possible

If there’s a delay, please don’t worry. Your chat will stay open, and they’ll get back to you as soon as they can. There’s no rush on your end either. You’ll receive an email notification as soon as there’s a new message.

What's your legal question?